Medieval Studies Student Colloquium
What is the Medieval Studies Student Colloquium?
The Medieval Studies Student Colloquium was founded in 1991 by Niall Brady (Ph.D. 1996) to give Cornell medievalists a forum in which to share ideas across the graduate disciplines. Once a year, we gather to present and discuss student papers on a wide variety of topics. The Colloquium is entirely organized and run by graduate students.
Click below to read the abstracts for all papers delivered at the Medieval Studies Student Colloquia since 1993.
1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 |
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007
2005
Colloquium Paper Abstracts
The Character of Widsið
Leigh Harrison | Medieval Studies
The Old English Widsið, uniquely preserved in
the famous tenth-century Exeter Book manuscript (though arguably
quite a lot older than that), has long puzzled and intrigued
those scholars who have chosen not to ignore it. But while its
two great exponents in the twentieth century, R. W. Chambers
and Kemp Malone, were in their rather exhaustive editions diligently
to research and elucidate for posterity the poem's characteristic
lists of early medieval peoples and somewhat involved poetic
structure, neither they nor those to follow them have done much
to interpret the poem in works of literary criticism—indeed,
to see Widsið as much of a poem at all.
This paper, as its title suggests, will examine the poem as
a poem on three levels: its general style and format (or character),
its speaker's degree of self-presentation (as the poem's somewhat
transparent main character), and most especially the rather unremittingly
allusive manner through which the poem invites us to call its
lists of heroes and tribes (its other characters) to mind. By
comparing Widsið 's "character," thus
broadly defined, with the style and substance of other analogous
written and oral traditions, we can perhaps gain a better understanding
of how the poem at least once functioned as a work of literature.
No less importantly, a better understanding of the "character" of Widsið can,
in turn, better inform us about the scantily-preserved æsthetic
and literary-representational priorities of the early Germanic milieux from
which such an anomalous work of English literature sprang.
The Unholy Pair: The
Specter of Cain and Eve in Beowulf
Caitlin Callaghan | Medieval Studies
The Beowulf poet develops an undeniable affiliation
between Cain and Eve and Grendel and Grendel’s mother in
his poem. But to what extent can this affiliation be extended
to positive identification? Can we claim that Cain is Grendel,
and Eve actually Grendel’s mother? By working with the
two narrative frameworks—one Germanic and character-based,
one Christian and audience-based—I will show through an
examination of terminology, Augustinian commentary, and even
English place-names that the connection between these four may
be deeper than it appears.
An articulation of various characters’ genealogies establishes
their integrity and reputation throughout Beowulf, and
Grendel’s receives the same attention. The narrative development
of Grendel as a combination of monster and man invites a careful
examination of the ways in which his genealogy perhaps mirrors
Cain’s. The terms grimma gæst and ides describe
Grendel and his mother, respectively, in the poem, but we find
these terms applied to other characters in other Anglo-Saxon
texts, sometimes in positive ways. Similarly, the prevalence
of peace-weaving females in Beowulf, and the possible
identification of Eve as a failed peace-weaver after the Fall,
suggests a different reading of Grendel’s mother. Is she
the early English Church’s insinuation of the First Woman,
a gross manipulation? Lastly, if Augustine’s assertion
that the earthly city is the work of Cain and his heirs, and
Heorot, according to Stephen Bandy, is such a city, then can
we argue that Hroðgar and his men are in the service of Cain
as well?
By drawing these various threads together, I will argue that
Beowulf and the other Scandinavian warriors battle in the spirit
of Cain and his kin, while the failed peace-weavers Wealhtheow,
Hygd and Hildeburh struggle in the spirit of Eve.
What a Bitch!: genre, genitalia, and social-climbing
in The Tale of Sarcastic Halli (Sneglu-Halla Þáttr)
Jeff Turco | German Studies
Two established ways of elaborating a "genre-system"of
Medieval Icelandic literature are (1) through a relative chronology
of the putatively-historical narrated events (i.e., sagas of
ancient times, sagas of Icelanders, contemporary sagas) and (2)
through the social status of the protagonist (i.e., kings, bishops,
or knights saga, family saga, lying saga, folktale). To date,
however, there has been little consideration of internal evidence
for the
consciousness of such systems on the part of those who allegedly worked within
them: are they just latter-day scholarly abstractions? I argue for an authorly
awareness of one such system (a hierarchy of genres) on the basis of a (perilously)
close reading of the Icelandic Tale of Sarcastic Halli, and arrive
at the (tentative) conclusion that questions of genre are analytically useful
for us precisely because they had real generative force for an Icelander writing
in the thirteenth century. Sarcastic Halli, the unrelentingly raunchy
tale of two Icelandic country-boys competing as court-poets in Norway, features
a figure whose one-upmanship and sexual-defamation of his rivals (including
his own royal patron) depend on his self-reflexive mastery--and his foes corresponding
ignorance--of generic convention. Halli establishes his social position through
a concerted manipulation of these conventions, ensconcing himself in a network
of allusion to myth (which trumps even kingship, since kings are genealogically
subordinate to the gods), while framing his peers and superiors as the sexual-deviants
and low-lifes of an excrement-besmirched folktale-world. Hence, the risqué Tale is
not simply a series of virtuoso vituperations based on sexual-cum-bathroom
humor, but is only funny (or only really funny) from the perspective
of considerable literary connoisseurship and an awareness of genre that reflects
the concerns of social class and political power in thirteenth-century Iceland.
Kings’ Bodies and
Legitimate Succession: Physical Propaganda in Late Anglo-Saxon
England
Nicole Marafioti | Medieval Studies
In this paper, I will argue that usurping kings
in late Anglo-Saxon England used their predecessors’ bodies
to legitimize their own dubiously acquired authority, removing
their deposed opponents’ corpses from the public eye while
glorifying the relics of royal saints of previous generations.
The remains of posthumously sanctified kings were enshrined in
churches and celebrated by cults, often with the endorsement
of reigning rulers who wished to reinforce their own authority
by invoking the legacy of irreproachable monarchs of the past.
Usurpers appropriated these relics to forge an association with
a lawful royal line; but they also made efforts to deny the legitimacy
of their immediate predecessors, depicting themselves as the
true heirs to the saintly kings of the preceding generation.
This was accomplished, in part, by depriving their deposed predecessors
of the royal memorialization that legitimate kings deserved:
without public burial, a king’s memory would presumably
die out among the population, since his body could not become
the center of religious devotion or the focus of political resistance
against the new regime. My discussion will concentrate on two
usurpers, Æthelred “the Unready” and William
the Conqueror, who secured their positions through the violent
deaths of their immediate predecessors: each king attempted to
legitimize his own authority by concealing the resulting corpse
while openly celebrating the sanctified remains of the previous
king. The deposed kings’ bodies and the preceding kings’ relics
were employed as physical propaganda, asserting that the new
kings – and not their slain predecessors – were the
legitimate successors to the realm.
Bifurcated Memories of a Medieval Borderland: Remembering
and Forgetting the Arrival of the Teutonic Knights in Poland
Paul Milliman | Department
of History
In 1226 Duke Konrad of Mazovia
invited the Teutonic Knights to Poland to help defend his duchy
from attacks by the neighboring pagan Prussians. He granted
them the land of Chełmno,
located on the right bank of the Vistula River, to serve as their
base of operations. According to the Teutonic Knights’ chronicler,
Peter of Dusberg, writing in the 1320s, Konrad made this donation
in perpetuity with the consent of his family, his nobles, and
the Polish bishops who had ecclesiastical jurisdiction over the
area. However, according to the arguments proposed by King
Kazimierz the Great’s lawyers in 1339, Konrad (Kazimierz’s
great-grandfather) had granted the land of Chełmno only
for a period of 20 years; after the Teutonic Knights had conquered
the Prussians, they were supposed to have returned Konrad’s
grant and moved to the conquered Prussian lands.
My paper will examine how these bifurcated memories were preserved
and propagated by examining the tension and interplay between
orality and literacy in the development of medieval historical
consciousness. The source materials pertaining to this
dispute present us with a unique opportunity to examine the development
of social memory, because in addition to charters and chronicles,
we also have the lengthy testimonies of the 30 witnesses who
testified about this matter in Kazimierz’s 1339 trial against
the Teutonic Knights. Some of these witnesses made reference
to written documents, but the majority related memories passed
on to them by their family members and friends. Examining
these testimonies in conjunction with the charters and chronicles
allows us a possibility to analyze how over 100 years later the
two sides in the dispute had come to believe such radically different
versions of the same story. Furthermore, this analysis
can shed some light on the phenomenon of group identity formation
in the middle ages as it is informed and transformed by the development
of historical consciousness.
The Glory and the Lessons
of the Past: Rome and
Etruria in Book I of Leonardo Bruni's History of the Florentine
People
Colleen Slater |
Department of History
Leonardo Bruni (1370-1444), chancellor of Florence (1427-44)
was best known and most praised in his own time and the following
decades for his History of the Florentine People. But
while much of the text’s popularity then had to do with
its glorifying portrayal of the city’s illustrious past,
its interest for modern historians lies in the many breaks with
tradition between Bruni’s History and those of
previous generations. The topic of this paper is to examine one
of these changes: how Bruni discusses the ancient history of
Florence in the beginning of Book I. Although the space devoted
to this topic in the text is relatively small, I will argue that
Bruni makes several very important changes in his representation
of Florence’s ancient past that reflect important political
issues in his own day. First, for the first time, the history
of the Etruscans is discussed in a Florentine history, glorified
as the first great empire, and marked as the first communal government.
Second, Bruni calls into question the long established medieval
tradition of claiming that Rome was the ultimate founder of Florence’s
glorious traditions and past, and instead links not only Florence’s
greatness to the Etruscan state, but also Rome’s, and portrays
Florence’s relationship with ancient Rome as ambiguous
at best. Through these changes, Bruni is able to claim a new
and celebrated heritage of a previous Tuscan empire unique to
Florence, rather than sharing with other great city-states the
heritage of Rome. Also, through examining in detail the fall
of the Etruscan empire, Bruni warns contemporary Florentines
against the factionalism and division within the Florentine territorial
state in struggles against Milan and Naples in recent years that
may hinder the rise of the second great Tuscan empire, with Florence
at its head.
Practical Paradise: Love and Economics in a late Middle English
poem
Elizabeth Walgenbach | College of Arts &
Sciences
The Isle of Ladies has been called a love poem or a
vision of male sexual conquest, in either instance, a fantasy
framed by the conventions of the dream vision. Its value has
been measured by its ability to unite a jumble of motifs and
the “charm” of its narrator’s self-conscious
blundering. As part of the Chaucerian apocrypha, the poem has
also come under extensive and universally unfavorable comparison
with the works of its alleged author. Missing from the discussion
is a systematic investigation of how it relates to its contemporary,
and not only literary, context.
This paper examines episodes and characterizations in The
Isle of Ladies against the social and political backdrop
of late fifteenth-century England, investigating its stylistic
and thematic treatment of recognizable issues and phenomena.
In love the poem’s narrator may be, but his “dream” is
not impotent wishful thinking. His lamentations and lovelorn
antics veil pragmatic reasoning. Whatever the narrator’s
personal charms, his implicit arguments invoke third parties
and stress the social, economic, and communal benefits of marriage. The
Isle of Ladies is not, I argue, a timeless fantasy, but
a vilification of a particular group’s earthy aspirations.
This paper seeks to articulate these aspirations, identify
their likely proponents, and define the circumstances that
may have generated such a response.
Abundance and the Poetics of Praise in the Renaissance English
Lyric
Bryan Lowrance | College of Arts & Sciences
Fictions of abundance exist in human thought almost as far back
as recorded history stretches; imaginary spaces like the Garden
of Eden mark religious and mythological complexes in Western
Society and throughout the World. The Later European Middle Ages,
however, witnessed a distinct shift in the imaginative treatment
of abundance. Fictions of abundance (both spiritual and material)
ceased to be fantastical projections towards imaginary locales
and instead became linked with European perceptions of, and interactions
with, overseas territories increasingly opened by colonial expansion.
This paper is part of a broader project charting the development
of the idea of abundance in late medieval and early modern European
cultural history, especially as it pertains to the development
of European Petrarchan love lyric. Petrarchan sonnets evidence
a poetics of praise through description, and this description
relies on generating images of abundance to convey the beloved’s
value and elevate her (or him) above worldly concern and worldly
commodity. But these very attempts betray themselves in the corporeal
rudiments of their ethereal discourse, and material points of
poetic comparison Petrarchan lyrics rely on frequently have important
positions in both European in both European relations with (and
exploitations of) the extra-Occidental world as well as the cultural
mythologies that sustained them. Thus we can read in Petrarchan
poetry both the participation of amatory lyric in many of the
same cultural/material fantasies as those that sustained commerce
and colonialism as well as the conscious resistance of the genre
and its writers to these worldly associations. In my paper I
focus on England particularly, sketching the development of Petrarchan
lyric in the English sixteenth century through close readings
of Thomas Wyatt and Philip Sidney and suggesting how shifts in
the development of the English love lyric can be linked to the
belated emergence of England as a colonial and commercial superpower.
The
words we use: stallage in medieval England
Jenn Watkins | Medieval Studies
Modern scholars
have been remarkably productive in writing about markets, commerce
and their development over the long 13th century. However,
these very same scholars have not given much attention to the
meanings of the words used in documents that relate to the physical
marketplace. For example, "stallage" is a word
commonly used in fiscal documents with respect to markets. Modern
scholars like James Masschaele and Peter Sawyer tend to define
it in general terms as a payment for stalls or not at all. However,
a proper understanding of stallage does contribute to how we
understand medieval markets to have been arranged and organized. This
is particularly important in England as the word "stallage" appears
to have been imported into the country after the Norman conquest. By
the 13th century, stallage, along with tolls, was used to distinguish
formal markets, whether chartered or prescriptive in origin,
from informal gatherings (at which trade, nevertheless, probably
occurred). This paper will trace the use of the word "stallage" and
its definition from the 11th to 14th centuries to illustrate
its development and adoption into use in medieval England, with
all the implications to our understanding of the history of markets
that it causes.
"With more addyng to": Caxton and the
1483 Festial
Curtis Jirsa | Medieval
Studies
Both Caxton’s 1483 and 1491 versions of John Mirk’s Festial have
recently attracted critical attention on account of the supplementary
texts that Caxton chose to issue with the popular fourteenth
century sermon cycle. Although these textual compilations do
inform us about Caxton’s fifteenth century audience, the
very different nature of his two printings of the popular sermon
cycle itself merit closer scrutiny than they have thus far received.
The first version [STC 17957] was printed only once before Caxton
abandoned his template in 1491, adopting instead the 1486 text
of the Festial printed by Rood and Hunte, which was
subsequently reprinted by both Caxton and his successor Wynkyn
de Worde regularly until 1532. The differences between the 1483
and 1491 printings are stark, both in terms of layout (the latter
favoring columns and decorative initials) and text. The 1483
printing seemingly contradicts Mirk’s original intention
of writing for those suffering from “defaute of bokus and
sympulnys of letture” by including lengthy passages in
Latin, including a full indulgence issued by the Council of Basel
(unrecorded in the STC) and references to the Corpus Iuris
Canonici. This paper proposes to investigate the unique
nature of Caxton’s 1483 Festial and to situate
it within the Festial manuscript tradition (simultaneously
scrutinizing and troubling the accepted A-B branches of the Festial stemma)
and later 15 th century print editions in an attempt to determine
why Caxton abandoned his original template.
Witchcraft: Not Just for Women
Anymore
Chris Bailey | Department of History
Based on the observations of contemporary authors and witchcraft
treatises like The Malleus Maleficarum, historians have
traditionally assumed that members of early modern society conceived
of witches only as female. Women comprised the majority of individuals
accused of witchcraft; however, a significant number of men were
accused as well. In recent years, researchers have begun to investigate
the gender aspect of witchcraft in order to explain why the majority
of accused witches were women. There has been, however, a paucity
of research addressing why men were charged with witchcraft.
In their groundbreaking analysis of male witchcraft, Male
Witches in Early Modern Europe, Lara Apps and Andrew Gow
assert that early modern society perceived witchcraft as a feminine
crime because the diminished mental capacity of women left them
more susceptible to Satan’s influences. They further posit
that men who were accused of witchcraft were described as weak-minded,
and implicitly feminized, since this trait had been so heavily
associated with women. By investigating early modern concepts
of feminized men, such as papists and sodomites, this essay will
argue that, based on the attribute of mental weakness, men accused
of witchcraft were not feminized because the characteristic of
weakmindedness alone is an insufficient criteria upon which to
suggest the feminization of men. A survey of witchcraft literature
suggests otherwise; men, while described by the same terms as
their female analogues, were accused of witchcraft as men, which
may imply that the term ‘witch’ was perhaps more
gender-neutral than previously thought.
Vox populi, vox dei, vox
regis? Thomas Scott & the
Idealization of Parliament in Early Stuart England
Matt Davenport | Department of History
Thomas Scott (d. 1626) a preacher, pamphleteer
and self-styled prophet rose to preeminence, in both print and
manuscript, during the debate swirling around the proposed Spanish
marriage for Charles, Prince of Wales. In recent historiography
Scott has been noteworthy for his implementation of two supposed
and related consensus ideologies---anti-popery and Hispanophobia.
While Scott’s
arguments about the function of Parliament, and the relationship
of that body with the English people have been under analyzed.
A full analysis of Scott’s conception of Parliament will
elucidate how a member of a highly debated ideological consensus
viewed the purpose of Parliament and its relationship vis-à-vis
the Sovereign and the English people. An analysis of this type
could shed light on how pull of competing national and local
interests affected a single pamphleteer and his audience. This
paper will argue that on several levels—from selection
of the titles of his works to selection of frontis pieces to
his written argument—Scott was arguing for the centrality
of popular participation in politics through their parliamentary
representatives in all matters of state, even the so-called arcana
imperii. A close reading of a progression of Scott’s
pamphlets using structural, textual and visual analysis will
lead to a more complete view of the texts as both ‘puritan’ polemic
and constitutional critique.
To Top